defining freedom

i’ve been in several conversations over the past few weeks about freedom, each of them excellent. and in each of them, i get to work more and more with my personal definitions of freedom. at this point, i’m working with three:

  1. nina simone’s definition of freedom: no fear (source)
  2. “freedom is commitment.” - a definition i learned from some nuns many years ago
  3. “knowing who you belong to and how.” — me

that last one is the one i’ve been developing personally. it resonates so deeply because it rejects the warped definition of freedom i think is dominant in american culture.

i think undeveloped definitions of freedom lean towards “ability to do whatever one wants, whenever one wants to.” a few weeks ago i was chatting with someone who shared that she didn’t believe freedom existed. by her definition, “action without consequence,” was impossible. and i wholeheartedly agreed! but my definition of freedom counters that other definition in a way that i think makes freedom possible.

i don’t much about riverside presbyterian church, but i like this blog post that has this line:

“…a by-product of freedom is choice…Freedom is not an invitation to aimless wandering; it is an invitation to form a purpose and then commitment…”

love that.

ciao.

words / writing / post-processing
193w / 10min / 4min