queering eldering

so i told myself i wasn’t going to write blog posts until i finished with my book edit. well the book edit is taking longer than i had hoped (largely due to my own inconsistency of editing) so i think i will occasionally drop a thought here and there just so i don’t lose them.

this thought is about definitions of eldering.

a couple weeks ago, i went on a walk in the arboretum with seth k and we were talking about eldering as a concept. i was telling him about pádraig ó tuama saying that (after i asked him if he would elder me) that he was interested in the idea of queering the notion of eldering. and i’ve been sitting with that question for a while.

well, on our walk, i mentioned to seth that one way i’ve been thinking about queering eldering is that it could be much more fluid. the thought came because i’ve experienced in queer life that boundaries between different roles people have in your life can be fluid. friends who became lovers, work partners who become lovers and then fade from being lovers but still manage functioning work relationships, lovers who become business partners, there are just all these examples i have of guys blurring boundaries.

so what i think could/should be possible in eldering roles is for people to ask and choose when to play elder. for example, if i’m in community with a group of men who i consider my peers, all of the following could be possible:

i’m sure there are other possibilities here, but those are just the ones i’ve thought of so far. the point is that “elder” as a static term may or may not be the most helpful in all situations.

two other thoughts:

  1. i like seth’s definition of elder: “one who is most trusted.”
  2. dangit… i lost my other thought while typing out that first one…fuck lol.

words / writing / post-processing
393w / 16min / 5min